• Home
  • About
  • Africa
  • Americas
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Middle East
  • Russia
  • South Asia
  • Space
  • World
  • Newsletters
  • Podcast
  • Contributors
  • Write For Us
  • Contact Us
Facebook Twitter YouTube
  • Leaders
  • States
  • Networks
  • Ideologies
  • Technologies
Facebook Twitter YouTube
Globely NewsGlobely News
  • Africa
  • Americas
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Middle East
  • Russia
  • South Asia
  • Space
  • World
Subscribe
Trending
  • Zelensky Seeks Biden and Trudeau Support for Long War
  • Race for Green Metals Goes to South Asia
  • The Ukraine War Is Accelerating the Global Spread of Dangerous Weapons
  • The Ukraine War Will Go On for a Long Time
  • The Ukraine Counter-Offensive: Why the Black Sea Is Key
  • Trudeau Should Stand His Ground in Clash With India Over Killing
  • The Belt and Road Initiative Could Be a Debt Trap for China
  • Russian Attacks on Journalists in Ukraine Are Potential War Crimes
Globely NewsGlobely News
Home » China Shows Why Proposed EU Subsidies for Green Tech Could Backfire
Europe

China Shows Why Proposed EU Subsidies for Green Tech Could Backfire

Jun Du and Holger GörgBy Jun Du and Holger GörgMarch 4, 2023
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp
eu subsidies green technology china
The EU is now proposing to introduce its own tax credits and subsidies for cleantech companies, as well as fast-tracking regulation in this area.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp

The European Union is preparing to abandon its longstanding restrictions on state aid to take on U.S. and Chinese subsidies over green technologies. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen is spearheading a new commitment from EU leaders to “act decisively to ensure its long-term competitiveness, prosperity and role on the global stage”.

She has talked about the need to counter hidden subsidies from the Chinese, both in green tech and in other sectors, though the trigger for the EU’s new approach is really President Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). This has committed the U.S. to a record $369 billion (£305 billion) to green its economy, including using tax breaks and subsidies.

It effectively tears up the international consensus around not using state aid, embracing what the U.S. has railed against for years. The Economist has said that globalization is no longer about racing, but racing and tripping others.

The EU is now proposing to introduce its own tax credits and subsidies for cleantech companies, as well as fast-tracking regulation in this area.

Meanwhile, the UK has been coming under pressure from the likes of car manufacturers to respond. So far, it has been trying to find exemptions to the U.S.’s general approach of only offering incentives to products made in America, while also claiming the UK has no need to subsidize these kinds of areas because it is already ahead.

The economics of this drift to protectionism are worrying. Our recent research on the effects of state subsidies in China suggests that such policies could do the U.S. and EU economies more harm than good overall.

What the Research Says

Since the dawn of the industrial revolution, states have played a significant role in developing their economies. China is the recent prime example, where the use of subsidies to develop particular industries such as electric cars or solar panels has been highly visible.

India seems to be moving in the same direction. The government is paying half of the cost of making computer chips, among a variety of incentives to encourage investment in different sectors.

Equally, in the developed world, government procurement has driven many world-changing innovations. Whole sectors such as biotech and information technology relied on government procurement to get started. America’s Silicon Valley originally grew on the back of military contracts, for instance.

Research in this area does acknowledge a case for subsidizing infant industries in which a country wants to specialize. China’s state subsidies in the steel and solar panel industries would be a good example.

Yet there is a price to be paid: the money a government spends means that less will be available for helping its citizens in other ways. For example, Brazil’s wheat-industry subsidies in the 1980s were estimated to have produced a net loss of 15% in welfare spending.

Around the same time, it was estimated that if the EU removed the common agricultural policy, the extra money available for government spending could increase real incomes by between 0.3% and 3.5% as a proportion of GDP. Findings like these probably explain why the World Trade Organization has discouraged state aid for decades.

Consequences

The new green subsidies will create winners and losers at different levels. Within the EU, for example, it will un-level the playing field between member states. Those that can afford to spend more on their green tech industries will potentially crowd out those with less.

Even within a country, there’s unlikely to be a win-win. Our research team has recently published a paper about China’s subsidies, using a new approach that makes it possible to estimate the direct and indirect effects on subsidized and non-subsidized firms at the same time.

This is the first time anyone has looked at subsidies in this way. Our project looked at 1998-2007, since those were the years when the necessary data was available.

We found that subsidized firms become relatively more productive, thus making them more competitive. Yet firms that are not subsidized can see their productivity growth reduced.

The determining factor is whether they operate in a geographical cluster alongside subsidized firms. When more than a quarter of firms in a cluster in China were being subsidized, the remainder suffered.

Those losing out were typically foreign-owned firms and those owned by the Chinese state, while private Chinese firms were the beneficiaries.

When we aggregated all the data, it showed that this negative indirect effect tends to dominate. In other words, subsidies produce unintended losers and make the market less competitive and more inefficient as a whole.

The bottom line is, subsidies are not without problems, even for China. In the last decade we have seen what “losers” can do to an economy, or a society — think of movements toward populism and autocracy in many places.

Therefore, there needs to be a more thorough debate about the benefits and costs of subsidies before states apply them, and some carefully designed policies to prepare for the potential losers.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Jun Du

Jun Du is a professor of economics and director of the Center for Business Prosperity at Aston University.

    This author does not have any more posts.
Holger Görg

Holger Görg is acting president of the Kiel Institute for the World Economy.

    This author does not have any more posts.
China Chinese Economy Economy European Union Green Technology

More from Globely News

Race for Green Metals Goes to South Asia

September 25, 2023

The Belt and Road Initiative Could Be a Debt Trap for China

September 19, 2023

Pakistan’s U.S. Tilt Risks Chinese and Russian Ire

September 18, 2023

China’s Tech Crackdowns Crush Entrepreneurship

September 14, 2023

China’s New Strategy to Undermine Human Rights

September 7, 2023

Why China is Abandoning Its Wolf Warrior Diplomacy

September 7, 2023
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Newsletter

Subscribe to the Globely Daily

Our flagship newsletter covers the leaders, states, networks, ideologies, and technologies that are transforming world power.

Zelensky Seeks Biden and Trudeau Support for Long War

September 25, 2023

Race for Green Metals Goes to South Asia

September 25, 2023

The Ukraine War Is Accelerating the Global Spread of Dangerous Weapons

September 22, 2023

The Ukraine War Will Go On for a Long Time

September 22, 2023
© 2023 Globely News.
  • Home
  • About
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Contributors
  • Write For Us
  • Contact Us

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Do not sell my personal information.
SettingsAccept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
SAVE & ACCEPT

Ad Blocker Enabled

Ad Blocker Enabled
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.
Go to mobile version